I love this concept! I’d file this both under behavioral economics & identity economics - because the technology of “👍” and “♥️” and “⬆️” (and their antitheses) were generated in the code, respectively baked into analytics by which we measure our performance, and because an algorithm “makes or breaks you,” we must consciously work to recognize each other’s work for the sake of the collective.
I profoundly agree. And this is a conversation that we have been deepening and expanding considerably, especially recently: How we big one another up, how we flow recognition nutrients through the shared physiology of our living collective organism. Thank you for sharing your behavioral science take, Tess! I love it.
I love this concept! I’d file this both under behavioral economics & identity economics - because the technology of “👍” and “♥️” and “⬆️” (and their antitheses) were generated in the code, respectively baked into analytics by which we measure our performance, and because an algorithm “makes or breaks you,” we must consciously work to recognize each other’s work for the sake of the collective.
😌 my behavioral science take.
I profoundly agree. And this is a conversation that we have been deepening and expanding considerably, especially recently: How we big one another up, how we flow recognition nutrients through the shared physiology of our living collective organism. Thank you for sharing your behavioral science take, Tess! I love it.